(Thanks to Cathy for linking to this!)
New York Times article asks is a book still a book if it’s read on Kindle/Sony Reader/any other device? It was an interesting article and I’d recommend giving it a read.
I don’t have a Kindle or Sony Reader for several reasons. Firstly, I couldn’t afford one , and secondly, I’m just not sure than I do want one even if I could. I know the real book versus e-book debate isn’t a new one and I’m not about to go over it all again – mainly because I can see both sides of the argument. I am, however, pleased and fascinated to read a new (to me) arguing point in the New York Times, a reputable, one might even argue ‘high-brow’ paper…
If you’re reading on a Kindle, no one can be impressed with what you’re reading.
I’m not saying that I read to impress, far from it. In fact, the range of my reading habits are more likely to confuse than impress. But I do agree with the articles point that what you are seen to be reading does make an impression, favourable or otherwise. I like being out and about and being able to see what other people are reading. I enjoy people-watching via their book covers. With the e-device, I have no idea what they’re reading.
I myself have been caught out reading documents on my phone (not an e-reader, but it does support text files) – people have asked me what I’m reading, knowing that I’m a reader, and surprised when I answer that I’m reading fanfiction*. The Kindle takes the fun out of book-spying. And, hey, I like book-spying!
What about you? Has (or do you anticipate) these devices taking some of the fun out of your reading in this regard? Or is it just me?
*Not that there’s anything wrong with fanfiction, I’m somewhat of an addict, but it’s not exactly Shakespeare.